![]() ![]() There are way more reasons than that to be honest - but those are a good start. These details typically include Hardware of the device, including Chassis details, cards added to the device, memory pool allocations etc. Solarwinds just gives you the name/IP/Model and open portsįor Windows PCs, Lansweeper gathers far more information without using an agent than Solarwinds does - and again it has clickable actions - RDP to that machine/open c$/shutdown etc. Overview The NCM Inventory feature scans devices via SNMP in order to Inventory specific details form them. It also has customisable actions - on an assets page I can click to ping that asset/open putty/open the asset's webpage etc. Conditional Access and MFA, Single Sign-On, Roles Based administration Certificate Management ITAM systems such as Lansweeper, Solarwinds or similar. The first thing is probably the layout - Lansweeper puts more information straight in front of you and is way easier on the eyes - too much white space in Solarwinds.įunctionally, Lansweeper gives far more information - for example for a network switch it will list each port and have a hyper link to the device that is being detected as being connected to that port, allowing you to click through to that asset. The asset discovery in Lansweeper is faaaar superior in Lansweeper than Solarwinds - though for the actual helpdesk the reverse is true. I have experience of both - more Lansweeper than Solarwinds to be fair. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |